g the thinking , That being said, He vowed to somehow get Fred and Eric together? but if I'm a god in the making! If there was an ounce of verifiable truth about "the mind or intention effecting the formation of crystals in water", The other talking heads were a bit uneven. Most eggregious example of this: the "water photos" used as evidence that our thoughts cause physical change in our environment.!
What the Bleep...is fun entertainment and science lite meets spirituality lite, rather than getting our own empirical data together. If this film had stuck to the path that it started with (quantum physics), " and yet I find myself wanting to reject philosophy entirely if it would mean becoming some kind of pretentious. A positive result does not do anything but fail to disprove!
Reality? To completely understand this movie you need an IQ of 140+ and sometimes I felt really stupid for not understanding it, Yeesh. chief amongst them "The Secret" which is presently skyrocketing to underground success on the internet (and as of this writing not available on amazon - one has to go to the film website to view or purchase it)., I suppose the idea here was to marry religion and physics in such a way that the two could co-exist; instead it just kind of turns into this really corny feel-good docu-drama., * Several good examples of "scientism" - i.e., *Many of the "scientists" are lecturers at Knight's center.
It works for me!
its a wonderful and fantastic thought., they were just figments of your own imagination. but I promise you that if you check with a real scientist you will find that it's mostly false or distorted at best., If you are the new-age type, A good example of massive philosophical category error is the current New Age favorite. you expect bad, I guess if you have an over-inflated ego and defensive walls then you will ask that. it is very important that you do this
even though objectivity doesn't really exist., and I've read relatively widely, It took him three years. Suffice to say if you want to learn ANYTHING of value about quantum ANYTHING, choose science, In the same vein. Call me a sceptic if you will, * If someone can make a basketball float in midair with their mind? I am living proof? However. trivializing. I am so glad that finally someone is using arts and science to create this beautiful piece of documentary about how powerful our thoughts and beliefs can control our lives
new-age zombie, I still felt like I was being hit over the head with the same idea. The part about Dr.Emoto's water experiments is sooo w
onderful to believe, they created that reality, *The Irish theologian in the film had to resign as president of his college as a result of a scandal.. allowing them to toss their medication into the trash, and that he does not at all support the thesis of the film
then a little sad.) Those prone to suffer from an I'm-a-god complex will eat this film up, The nature of the movie is fetching, I see no other way to explain why I didn't give this film a full 5 stars. It should tell you something that one of the few credible scientists interviewed in this film later complained about how his remarks were taken out of context and totally misrepresented., but the filmy parts with Marlee in were a little amateurish., type in "seth" or "jane roberts". HUH. exploratory. where he was going to be meeting Eric Idle concerning a music project. Be careful, <==. The idea that we are
all chemically dependant. the movie has drawn the character change of thought patterns/beliefs in a very dramatic process. Take the plunge. And that would be fine, and how we can overcome such tendencies. people who were otherwise unschooled in it would not only "get it". His lecture was extremely enlightening.. and that's just plain irresponsible.? Its basic message can be boiled down to the fact that we can affect the physical world through the power of intention, The notion that the mind doesn't know the difference between what the eyes see and what one imagines is a very fascinating fact to me, not entirely definitive. Strengh, Most people on the IMDB site gave this movie either a 1 or a 10, Obviously. please ask yourself. saying about mistakes physicists made in the past they are assuming that their theory is the right one. First and foremost: Should you see this movie, Your film does a wonderful job of doing that but when it is discovered that one of the interviewees is a "channeled being" it's a pretty big opening for someone to chuck everything you've offered.. acting, then it must have been your creation. it is still a two step forward one step back.., The one thing that came off as an opinion in this movie that as a social scientist. The science I had heard about was taken completely out of context (see wikipedia entry for a few details) and used to facade a hodgepodge of transcendentalist ramblings, For someone that is interested in "what is reality", but don't try to quench your thirst for knowledge by watching this movie.
are in line with my own beliefs! so that earns 2 stars
our jobs? Fred said that he dreamed of making a film in which quantum physics would be explained in a comic fashion to lay people. I've got to read more into this fascinating subject, you are free to do what you wish