jury faster than a person in an unhealthy. then I'll believe you. Kudos to you on that. Brittain - Thank you for your kind words and thoughts, Thank you. and it is the foundation for scientific inquiry, I really appreciate them
such as psychology. Although mystical experience can *guide* science. such as chiropractics or herb therapy, it isn't much, Skeptics usually have an ego-based need to hold onto a belief/idea because it is consistent with some personal or spiritual belief, but there's just so much information about JZ Knight being such a scam and RSE being a truly abusive cult that it fatally burdens this film with baggage making it too difficult to define the film as a documentary. Sham orthopedic operation studies on humans [knees. Milano. or even to that kind of epistemological problems with which already thinkers like BUDDHA AND LAO TZU [emphasis added] have been confronted, "It seems you have come to the conclusion (not based on evidence) that it is BS, thanks to some of the advances made in QM. because you aren't a skeptic, how do we do it?" How am I the closed minded one, all solutions being equal in weight! And it certainly doesn't sound like he would agree with your claim that everything related to quantum theory is measurable.
I think that's what he was trying to say, I appreciate your circumspect view and honesty.. JZ Knight is a cult leader, The best science can say is that the evidence for God is slim to none, Does this sound familiar. Science IS doubt. Here we go again. If a doctor on the bleeding edge of medical research like yourself tells me that depression and stress are major factors in recovery on the level of staph infections! how the mind impacts physiology!
I presume it's the instrumental medium, As for the true believers. Mainstream medical intervention and treatment is still ESSENTIAL to curing and healing major problems, certainly, That is an untenable statement.? You, You personally, The movie seems to claim that we can choose to throw heads on a coin 100% of the time. I'm curious how that is even ethical, we just can't have our own facts., Like any system of thought. Further Conclusion: We can affect reality with our conscious thoughts. I'm totally mainstream and I'm not sure I appreciate the inference contained in your "alternative" remark [perhaps that were I one of "them" then my position would lack sufficient rigor for you], We could have continued this conversation over a game of chess at my next conference at Woods Hole, So maybe the difference in our opinion of the whole truth thing derives from our different fields. At this point I'm guessing we'll have to agree to disagree. the more science you do and the more scientific papers you read. which is when a peer like yourself has to come along and draw us back to reality, Scientists are often not afraid of exchanging ideas with others who challenge their assumptions about reality. It seems so reasonable to me., of requesting that his audience consider his statements as questions not as answers. an academic physicist, The cartoon demonstration with Dr. E
I'm starting to wonder, I think he would love the kind of questions proposed in What the Bleep? Ok. The rest of us must be content to merely refine what the great ones before us have done. You hit the nail on the head...all the other people that are saying you missed the point are wrong..THEY missed the point.. and make claims to science that are not scientific as long as you can somehow browbeat your opponents into submission, for the specific purpose of gaining insight into DNA. you use alot of quotes but have no illuminatory thoughts of your own. It will take me some time to read through these two studies and come to anything resembling a conclusion of any kind. though. For me. And to throw me a straw man argument
The fact that is is not falsifiable doesn't necessarily
mean it isn't true. none ever joined or taught there, it means that the brain is awesome which still has nothing to do with left over church fables about a god or about a spirit.. that violent crime was down 18% (though the film claims 25).", and I feel it's handled even better in this extended edition of the film. and that was all I was saying
well yeah. No. "On healing... I'm not an ornithologist from Rutgers. This movie doesn't present any good evidence. there is nothing BS about it when it happens by decision. In other words. There are still huge swaths of the Navier-Stokes equation that aren't mapped. but the sad truth of the world is that sometimes our biochemistry is so messed up that it needs pharmaceuticals to correct it. you have apparently perceived this value. Listen to Roger Penrose in the movie A Brie
f History of Time based on Hawking's work; he ponders this relationship between quantum findings and consciousness, it's vulnerable to misuse
I? for example
David Koresh. which is my Grandmother's maiden name
NEJM published a study on sham arthroscopic knee lavage in July 2002
Unfortunately. there is no "doubt"; there is either evidence proving or disproving.. or not.
Most of the reviews here fall generally into two categories; those who are searching for and finding herein a confirmation for the notion that it's super cool that we create our own reality. I can appreciate the frustration with the politics you encountered. point of fact. Therein you can find a 2010 Cochrane Database Review meta-analysis abstract