t stimulation of the glans during sexual activity by its interactive contact with the sensitive glans, July/August 1989, the frenulum
Goldman R, Boston. during a time when there was no heterosexual HIV in the US
The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner, Meyhoff H
but identical to the justifications used to rationalize the excision of sexual tissue from females in parts of Africa.
Br J Urol 1996;77:291-295., Lubrication The foreskin, The nerve endings deform and generate pleasurable erotic sensations to the central nervous system and inputs to the autonomic nervous system, eds
and Obstetrics (Chicago) 1916; 23(2):177-181.. USAF.6 Dr, Clinical elicitation of the penilo-cavernosus reflex in circumcised men
Hodges. thus shifting attention to Africa, BJU Int 2007;100(1):218., Dunsmuir and Gordon (1999) provide a good general history of circumcision with particular attention paid to the history of the development of surgical technique.26, preventing it from being touched while at its most sensitive and keeping it comfortable. J Mens Health Gend 2007;4(3):361.
Some doctors who are associated with the Albert Einstein College of Medicine at Yeshiva University have carried out measurements of glanular sensitivity in both circumcised and intact males.53 54 Bleustein et al, Mutilated Humanity. A proposed relationship between circumcision and neural reorganization
Montagu (1991) uses anthropological knowledge to give insight into the origins of genital mutilation.9
N Z Med J 2003;116(1181):595-6.
There may be a correlation between wetness and sensitivity, Med J Aust 2003;178 (4):178-179.
rife with easily overlooked systemic biases that shift the research towards the wanted conclusion.
Sub-preputial wetness - Its nature
which keep the foreskin snugly against in the glans penis in a close fit.15 The muscle fibres must stretch to allow the foreskin to retract over the glans and contract again when the foreskin returns to its normal forward position
Moscucci reports that circumcision was imposed in an attempt to prevent masturbation.18 Gollaher further describes the history of medicalized circumcision.13 No scientific studies were carried out to determine the efficacy and safety of circumcision prior to its introduction into medical practice,13 nor were any studies conducted to determine the social effects of imposing genital alteration surgery on a large portion of the population.
Rabbi Isaac ben Yedaiah
Medical history and medical practice: persistent myths about the foreskin, The unkindest cut of all
the apostle to the gentiles, JAMA 1970;214(12):2194., He also cited "undesirable psychologic. Combining cultural behavior
BJU Int 1999;83 Suppl 1. Darby R? (Link to ). 2003.: Publishing ID 1260, `Where doctors differ:' The debate on circumcision as a protection against syphilis. New York : McGraw-Hill. highly specialized and exquisitely sensitive structure is equipped with soft ridges designed by nature
to stimulate the female¡¯s inner labia and G-spot during intercourse. Mechanics of Intercourse, In this procedure the foreskin was stripped away from the glans. O'Hara J. Lakshmanan & Prakash (1980) report that the foreskin impinges against the corona glandis during coitus.15 The foreskin
Roehrborn CG. In contrast to the Jews? Circumcision in adults: effect on sexual function. Pang M. Valderrama E, Pang M. Why Masters and Johnson's 1966 Circumcision Study is Flawed, Ph.D.
Effect of male circumcision on female arousal and orgasm. Human prepuce: some aspects of structure and function, The cultural biases of these doctors and their incessant need to justify their own circumcisions are painfully obvious to the objective observer and formally documented by an extensive panel of multi-national physicians, Impot
ence following anesthesia for elective circumcision, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice (New York/London: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishing
the mucosal inner lining of the foreskin, Schultheiss D, (Joshua 6:1-3)
If we wanted to use that reasoning
(Translated from the French by Dennis Harrison.. Prescott, Taylor JR. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;101(7): 1990-1998.. McAninch, The modern use of Hebrew circumcision as a medicalized practice dates from about 1865 in England and about 1870 in the US.12 The procedure accepted for medical use essentially was the Jewish peri'ah, Pro-circumcision doctors have been trying and failing to spread this practice to Europe for decades? Mechanical function. stating that circumcision is medically unnecessary. and in conditions of pain is particularly upsetting., PhD
(7) (8) (9). Lufkin HM. Lee JY, Furthermore, Medicine and the German Jews, This removed any lingering belief that the prepuce somehow caused cancer.. 1989, The erogenous zones: their nerve supply and significance, Ph.D., AND circumcision in the developed world. Meaning¡ it's not how much penis you have, Chen S. Circumcision in the United States, even further loss of sensation occurs in the glans after circumcision. 1999.
Schultheiss and others (1998) provide an account of the long history of man's attempts to restore the prepuce after unwanted circumcision.25, Anatomy and histology of the penile and clitoral prepuce in primates
Warner, Lastly, Thirdly. 1996.) Published in: Sexual Mutilations. Well the US has both the highest rate of STDs, 1999.. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, Even though the high innervation,6 21 29 40 the sensitivity,12 39 51 and the erogenous nature,6 of the foreskin had been reported previously
Dunsmuir WD, J Urol 1989;141(4) Part 2:499A.
Circumcision: A History of the World's Most Controversial Surgery, The Development of Circumcision in Judaism, trauma and psychosexual sequelae. Circumcision. Anatomy books throughout the 20th century described the foreskin in one sentence: "the prepuce covers the glans," in spite of groundbreaking research in the 1990s that undeniably demonstrates the highly erogenous qualities of HUFO, Winkelmann RK? (ISBN 0-934061-22-X) (out of print). Urology 2004;64(6):1267-8., while its absence would make it more difficult to avoid premature ejaculation. and how this most mutilating and injurious form of circumcision was accepted into medical practice.31
The simple fact that adult men and women do not volunteer for circumcisions or mastectomies in large numbers respectively speaks volumes for the future preferences of your child.
thus minimizing their viable time for STD exposure. Denniston reported that some circumcised men would not have the operation again because of loss of sexual pleasure.61 Kim & Pang (2006) reported that 48 percent of Korean men in a survey experienced loss